'The aim of art is to present not the outward appearance of things, but their inner significance; for this, not the external manner and detail, constitutes true reality.' – Aristotle

Young Shakespeare Contemplating

Young Shakespeare Contemplating 2004

Ted May (b.1939)

Shakespeare Birthplace Trust

William Shakespeare (1564–1616) is the most famous playwright in history, though ironically, we know very little about his life and perhaps even less about what he really looked like.

There are two main reasons for this. Firstly (and very obviously), Shakespeare lived before the time of photography. Therefore any painterly depictions of him must be taken with a pinch of salt. On top of this, the many paintings that have been identified to be Shakespeare were simply false or misattributed.

Secondly, it is important to note that historically, artists didn't intend to capture the exact 'likeness' of their sitters. To convey the subject's wealth and status, or even their 'inner essence' from the unique perspective of the artist was deemed more important than accurately capturing their physiognomy.

To commemorate the anniversary of his death on 23rd April 1616, we delve into Art UK's collection to ponder over the many presumed portrayals of Britain's most-loved writer, the Bard.

Sutherland Gower Portrait

Painted around 1590, this is one of the earliest depictions of a man presumed to be Shakespeare (although it has not been officially identified as Shakespeare). This oil on copper portrait is also known as the 'Sutherland Gower Portrait of William Shakespeare'.

The Grafton Portrait

'The Grafton Portrait' (Portrait of an Unknown Man)

'The Grafton Portrait' (Portrait of an Unknown Man) 1588

unknown artist

John Rylands Research Institute and Library

There is no evidence that this portrait represents Shakespeare, but throughout the twentieth century the painting had numerous champions expressing the hope that it did so. The main reason for this attention is the original inscription that records the sitter's age as 24 in 1588, making him an exact contemporary of Shakespeare. The portrait depicts a rather beautiful youth with curly brown hair and grey eyes, wearing a sumptuous slashed scarlet doublet painted in such a way as to depict silk or satin. Some have suggested the clothing was too refined for an actor of the day.

The Chandos Portrait

William Shakespeare

William Shakespeare c.1600–1610

John Taylor (d.1651) (associated with)

National Portrait Gallery, London

The 'Chandos Portrait' (1600–1610) can be found in the National Portrait Gallery and is probably the most famous depiction of Shakespeare as well as the most likely to be a legitimate likeness. It is believed to have been painted by John Taylor (1585–1651) and served as the basis for the engraving of Shakespeare by Martin Droeshout (1601–1650) used in the First Folio (1623).

Named after the Dukes of Chandos who formerly owned the painting, it was bequeathed to The National Gallery in 1856, as one of the first works in its collection. It is believed that the painting was also once owned by playwright Sir William Davenant (1606–1668), who according to some chroniclers, was an illegitimate son of the playwright.

The Cobbe Portrait

The Cobbe Portrait of William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

The Cobbe Portrait of William Shakespeare (1564–1616) c.1610

British (English) School

National Trust, Hatchlands

This Jacobean portrait painted around 1610 is believed to be of Shakespeare. The original version of the painting was found in the Cobbe family's collection in 2006, and shortly after many scholars claimed it was a true likeness of the playwright. The work had originally belonged to the family of Henry Wriothesley (1573–1624), one of Shakespeare's most important patrons.

However other scholars have claimed the portrait is of Sir Thomas Overbury (1581–1613), an English poet and essayist.

The Soest Portrait

William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

William Shakespeare (1564–1616) c.1667

Gilbert Soest (c.1605–1681)

Shakespeare Birthplace Trust

This portrait of Shakespeare by Netherlandish artist Gilbert Soest (c.1605–1681) appears to have been based on the 'Chandos Portrait'. We do not know why Soest painted Shakespeare, although we know it was painted at least 20 to 30 years after the playwright's death.

The Chesterfield Portrait

The Chesterfield Portrait of William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

The Chesterfield Portrait of William Shakespeare (1564–1616) c.1679

Pieter Borsseler (1632–1692) (attributed to)

Shakespeare Birthplace Trust

Known as 'The Chesterfield Portrait' because it was once owned by the Earl of Chesterfield, this portrait has been attributed to the Dutch painter Pieter Borsselaer (1664–1687) circa 1679 (decades after the death of Shakespeare).

Angelica Kauffman Portrait

An Ideal Portrait of William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

An Ideal Portrait of William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

Angelica Kauffmann (1741–1807)

Royal Shakespeare Company Collection

In 1775, the prolific Swiss female painter Angelica Kauffmann (1741–1807) created this portrait of Shakespeare. Kauffman was notably one of the female founding members of the Royal Academy, becoming an academician in 1768.

The Flower Portrait

The Flower Portrait of William Shakespeare (1564–1616)

The Flower Portrait of William Shakespeare (1564–1616) c.1820–1840

British (English) School

Royal Shakespeare Company Collection

Declared to be a forgery in 2005, the 'Flower Portrait' was for centuries believed to be an accurate portrayal of Shakespeare. Originally believed to be painted in 1609 (according to its signed date), it was in fact, painted in the nineteenth century. It was clearly inspired by Droeshout's engraving of Shakespeare that appeared in the First Folio.

Lydia Figes, Art UK's Content Creator

Did you know?
  • Based on the myriad of portraits of Shakespeare in existence, we can probably assume that he was a white man with almond-shaped eyes, a longish face and a receding hairline
  • In 2016, to mark 400 years since the death of Shakespeare, Twitter created a modern-day rendering of the playwright with an emoji – because we don't have enough of them already
  • Despite the fact that it was produced by Harvey Weinstein and its historical accuracy has been refuted, there is perhaps no better cinematic portrayal of Shakespeare than Joseph Fiennes wearing tights in Shakespeare in Love... No?